Wednesday, February 21, 2007

1001 other possibilities

I've mentioned that there are a lot of people who are misdiagnosed because doctors aren't clear on what CFS is, what symptoms rule it out, what else it might be.

CFIDS.org provides the following list of other conditions with similar symptoms. 

Conditions that share some symptoms with CFS

Autoimmune
Behcet’s syndrome
Dermatomyositis
Lupus erythematosis
Polyarteritis
Polymyositis
Reiter’s syndrome
Rheumatoid arthritis
Sjogren’s syndrome
Vasculitis

Blood
Anemia
Hemochromatosis

Endocrine
Addison’s disease
Cushing’s syndrome
Diabetes mellitus
Hyperthyroidism
Hypothyroidism
Ovarian failure
Panhypopituitarism

Gastrointestinal
Celiac disease
Crohn’s disease
Irritable bowel syndrome
Sarcoidosis
Ulcerative colitis

Infectious
Bacterial endocarditis
Chronic brucellosis
Hepatitis
HIV infection
Lyme disease
Occult abscess
Poliomyelitis/post polio syndrome
Tuberculosis

Parasitic infection
Amoebiasis
Echinococcosis
Giardiasis
Toxoplasmosis

Fungal infection
Blastomycosis
Coccidomycosis
Histoplasmosis

Malignancies
Hodgkin’s disease
Lymphoma

Metabolic/toxic
Ciguatera poisoning
Exposure to toxic chemicals, heavy metals, pesticides
McArdle’s syndrome

Neuromuscular
Fibromyalgia
Muscular dystrophies
Multiple sclerosis
Myasthenia gravis

Psychiatric
Alcohol/drug abuse
Anxiety disorder
Depression
Hyperventilation syndrome
Manic-depressive illness
Schizophrenia

Others
Dysautonomias
Narcolepsy
Sleep apnea
Sweet’s syndrome
Wegener’s granulomatosis  
 
http://cfids.org/about-cfids/diagnostic-testing.asp#chart

Each and every one of these other diseases needs to be ruled out before a CFS diagnosis can be given.  CFS is not just "chronic fatigue" -- there are a lot of other medical conditions that cause chronic fatigue.

It's the constellation of other symptoms that make it CFS.

For example, CFS and MS have many symptoms in common, including fatigue and neurological problems, but double vision is one that can be used to definitively say it's MS; with CFS, it's more likely that your vision will be blurry instead.  A lot of CFS patients were diagnosed with "atypical MS".  A CFS specialist can tell you the difference, even if your PCP doesn't know.

An activist in the UK tells me that a lot of people there were wrongly diagnosed with CFS when what they actually had was Lyme or Brucellosis.  As a result of not getting the proper treatment for what they do  have, they got much worse.  With many of these infections, including CFS, time is of the essence.  The longer you're allowed to deteriorate with improper treatment, the longer it will take to recover (if at all; the damage may be too severe by the time you're properly diagnosed).

In my case, it's especially irksome because the doctors didn't need to MAKE a diagnosis.  They were told what the diagnosis was, and that it had been made by a virologist and confirmed by a rheumatologist.  All they had to do was give me the right pills.  They did not have to exercise a single brain cell, because I even told them what to give me.  They gave me everything else instead, then blamed me because I wasn't getting better.  Subsequent doctors have been totally confused, "what would it have hurt?" for them to humor me with some sleeping pills while waiting for the blood test results.

The only answer I have for that is, it would have hurt their egos to have to admit that the patient knew more than they did.  I'm permanently disabled, but the doctors' egos are intact.

And, no, that does not give me warm fuzzies to know that they feel better about themselves.


Tags: , , , , ,

CFS/Fibromyalgia Lobby Day, May 14-15

Lobby Day '07: Details and Registration Form Now Available

Join us in Washington, D.C. on May 14-15 for the CFIDS Association of America's 15th Annual Lobby Day events. Find all the details and a link to our Registration Form at http://www.cfids.org/advocacy/lobby-day.asp

Please, if you can possibly get to DC, do it, to speak on behalf of the many of us who can't travel that far. 

In 2003, our research budget was $6.8 million.  It has fallen steadily to a mere $4.9 million this year -- we've lost about a quarter of our already meager funding in just 4 years!  How can we make progress toward a cure if the funding is constantly cut?  CFS affects MORE people than some of the diseases that receive far more money, even though experts say that CFS is more disabling.

The forgotten minority

Thanks to my Research Guru John for turning this one up for me.  I can relate to the situations of the men in the article, BTDT, but as with most autoimmune diseases, fibro strikes women much more often than men, and the male patients tend to get lost in the big picture. (Just as, in the early days of CFS, pronouncements calling patients "just menopausal women" ignored the fact that there were a lot of men with it, too.)

Men and Fibromyalgia

By Bob Hall

----------------------------------------------------------

Michael J. Fox became a "one of a kind" type of guy because he stepped forward, and let the world know about his disease. He gained national attention, and received national compassion and sympathy because of his plight with disease. I applaud him for his courage to "take a stand" and bring awareness to a disease, and to get attention for Parkinson's and much needed research. But, he is a celebrity, and his job was fairly easy.

What about Jim? Jim has fibromyalgia. He is not famous, and not many people will know anything about the disease he struggles with on a day-to-day basis. Jim lives in constant pain, he fears losing his wife because he is no longer capable of "being a man." He fears his grandchildren fading away from him, because "Grandpa" can't do "Grandpa" things any more. His friends don't call anymore because he has been "sick" one time too many.

What about Chuck? Chuck has fibromyalgia. He is not famous, and not many people will know of his disease either. Chuck's wife has already left him. His doctors still think it is all in his head, and there is really nothing wrong with him. He suffered from a car accident, and as a result he ended up with a diagnosis of fibromyalgia. The "invisible disease." One of his doctors treats him like he is nothing more than a drug addict just wanting drugs. Yes, he does want drugs. He wants treatment for his chronic pain.

What about Dave? Dave has fibromyalgia too. Dave is one of those that people will never know he has fibromyalgia. Dave has trouble showing his pain, his feelings, and is afraid people will shun him because of his disease. He is afraid to let anyone know he is suffering. Dave is known to do things, to go overboard, and end up in bed for days, just to keep anyone from knowing he is in pain. Dave has a lot of anger, a lot of frustration, and a lot of pain.

What about Joe? Joe suffers from fibromyalgia. Joe is a trooper when it comes to his pain and disease. He never gives up, encourages others with the disease, and rarely displays a bad attitude. He has his good days, and his bad days, but is ever hopeful for a cure some day. He has a supportive spouse, and a close-knit family. He did however, lose his job due to the disease, and had to go on disability. Joe is active in his local support group, and is known to help others cope with the disease. Joe is the kind of person you would like to know even if you didn't have fibromyalgia.

What about Greg? Greg has fibromyalgia. His is so severe he is confined to a wheelchair, and rarely gets out of his home. He has very little quality life, and not much to look forward to anymore, just the chronic pain. He suffers now from panic attacks, from irritable bowel syndrome, chronic sleeping disorders, shortness of breath, and several other "cousins" of fibromyalgia. He depends on others to help him on a day-to-day basis. Most of his friends are on the internet, and talk to him from afar, only when he feels up to getting on the computer and chatting.

What about Bill? Bill has fibromyalgia. Bill is still trying to work and hold down a full time job. He is starting to have to call in sick more and more. His boss is putting more and more pressure on him to be on time, and not to call in sick. He really can't help it, as there are days when he just cannot work. His medical bills are mounting, his financial condition is falling, and his family is starting to suffer from his illness. His doctor says he needs to reduce the amount of stress, as stress makes fibromyalgia worse. On his way out of the doctors' office, the receptionist tells him they need a payment. This is a vicious circle. His medication bills are growing daily, along with other financial burdens.

You have just been introduced to a few of the men who frequent the menwithfibro.com website. The names have been changed, but they are all there. There isn't much on the Internet about men dealing with fibromyalgia, and that was the reason www.menwithfibro.com began. It began as a central point for men to come, to share, to learn, and to grow with the disease. Traditionally, more women have the disease than men, but the number of men with fibromyalgia is growing steadily. Part of the reason more men are not diagnosed is that men are just plain stubborn sometimes. And when it comes to going to the doctor, they are VERY stubborn as a general rule.

Men are raised to believe that men don't cry. They are told to "shake it off" and to "take it like a man." Men fix things, men are the hunters, men are supposed to be the breadwinners, the head of the household. Men are inundated with these concepts from a very early age. Showing pain is showing weakness to so many men. Fibromyalgia does not shake off. Fibromyalgia does not give up. It does not stop for anyone, or anything.

Hopefully the www.menwithfibro.com website will be stomping grounds for some of the men with fibro, and for women as well. The site is not just for men, but devoted primarily to men and how they choose to deal with fibromyalgia. Anyone is welcome to the site.

The site has a forum and the response there has been well received. Dr. Michael McNett from the Paragon Clinic in Chicago hosts one of the forums and discusses fibromyalgia openly. He has been a great asset and has been well received by all of the people coming to the sites. There is also a chat program available on the site.

The response to the website has been very good. Many say it is something that has been needed for a long time. Maybe it will be like a "Cheers" on the internet - a stopping place for men and women to grow as individuals, and share one with another. That is our goal and hope.

Since we're on the subject of men, I know my fellow activist Steve would never forgive me if I didn't point out his pet peeve -- NIH has CFS filed under "women's health" rather than "neurology".  Steve is heartily offended by being called a woman; I don't mind that, but I do suspect CFS would be given more research funding if it were recognized as a neurological condition and not some inherent problem of female hormones.

Now, if only we could have someone the calibre of Michael J. Fox step forward to put a face on CFS/fibro....

Another lookalike (that's not CFS)

http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20070220/news_lz1c20fluids.html

Even mild dehydration, a loss of just 1 percent to 2 percent of body weight, can produce symptoms including weakness, dizziness, fatigue, headache, and reduction in mental and physical performance.  
 
“The idea of drinking water is really essential to maintain normal good health,” says Dr. James Dunford, emergency room physician with UCSD Medical Center and medical director of San Diego's EMS system. “Water is needed to help preserve body functions and vital organs and maintain blood pressure. It brings nutrients to the cells and washes away the toxins. Water is the most important molecule we commonly take for granted.”  
 

In one of my CFS books, it comments that you can tell how bad a person's CFS is by the size of their water bottle.  Well, yes and no.  I do drink a lot of water when I'm running a fever or when we're having triple digit temperatures, but other than that, I don't drink huge amounts of water.  I usually sip at the same 20-ounce bottle all day (plus beverages with meals). 

This water-bottle theory may be another of those lookalike misdiagnoses, where people think they have CFS, but what they really have is "weakness, dizziness, fatigue, headache, and reduction in mental and physical performance" from dehydration.  As with every other lookalike condition, there are symptoms and test results that differentiate it from CFS. 

Unfortunately, over the past 20 years, the definition of CFS has been watered down to include anyone with fatigue for any reason.  Some of this was done by groups with ulterior motives (e.g., psychologists who saw a chance for profit in confusing CFS with an entirely different condition with a similar name and thus persuading the government to mandate years of psychotherapy for Disability recipients).  Some of it was done by people who don't understand that there's more to Chronic Fatigue Syndrome than chronic fatigue. 

As a result, there are a lot of doctors out there who apply the CFS label to people who don't have CFS, who never had CFS, who the experts would tell "you don't have CFS", who the neurological and immune system tests would prove don't have CFS.

Do yourself a favor -- if you don't have the symptoms described by the original CFS definition (such as fever, swollen lymph glands, and sore throat), hie thee to a CFS expert and get the right diagnosis.  If you have something as simple as dehydration, it's much easier to get back to feeling well than if you actually have CFS.

On the other hand, while you're waiting for that appointment, do your own First Aid experiments.  When I started fainting right after starting a new medication, by the time I went to the doctor, I was already able to tell him that I'd tried eating chocolate, proving it wasn't hypoglycemia, and I'd tried drinking extra water, proving it wasn't dehydration.  That ruled out two of the possibilities he was going to suggest.  If you feel much better after drinking more water, then you may have fixed the problem without the expense of a specialist appointment.    

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

New Fibromyalgia Research

A Critical Analysis of the Tender Points in Fibromyalgia.   Pain Med. 2007 Mar;8(2):147-156.

Harden RN, Revivo G, Song S, Nampiaparampil D, Golden G, Kirincic M, Houle TT.

Center for Pain Studies, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

PMID: 17305686


Objective. To pilot methodologies designed to critically assess the American College of Rheumatology's (ACR) diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia.

Design. Prospective, psychophysical testing.

Setting. An urban teaching hospital.

Subjects. Twenty-five patients with fibromyalgia and 31 healthy controls (convenience sample).

Interventions. Pressure pain threshold was determined at the 18 ACR tender points and five sham points using an algometer (dolorimeter).

Outcome Measures. The patients "algometric total scores" (sums of the patients' average pain thresholds at the 18 tender points) were derived, as well as pain thresholds across sham points.

Results. The "algometric total score" could differentiate patients with fibromyalgia from normals with an accuracy of 85.7% (P < 0.001). Even a single tender point had a diagnostic accuracy between 75% and 89%. Although fibromyalgics had less pain across sham points than across ACR tender points, sham points also could be used for diagnosis (85.7%; Ps < 0.001). Hierarchical cluster analysis showed that three points could be used for a classification accuracy equivalent to the use of all 18 points

                         * * *

There are still doctors who believe that fibro is a "wastebasket diagnosis", i.e., if you don't know what else to call it, diagnose fibro.  This research proves that there is a very accurate way to diagnose fibro, so any doctor who's just lumping all pain into that diagnosis is misdiagnosing at least some of his patients.

If your doctor has diagnosed fibro without testing the 18 tender points, ask him why not done that test.  If he has no clue what you're talking about, visit Co-Cure.org and find a doctor in your area who does know that there's a specific test for it.

If your doctor, like one of mine, diagnosed fibro when you had 11/18 tender points and then tried to un-diagnose it when you fell slightly below that, you should know that the 11/18 points are only required for an initial diagnosis.  The diagnostic criteria recognized that there were times when you might not hurt as much.  Less than a year after my doctor tried to claim my fibro diagnosis was in error because on one particular day I only had 10/18, another doctor got 18/18.  He had a dolorimeter -- a device that measures the amount of pressure being applied.  To make the diagnosis, you need to feel pain at 10 pounds or less of pressure.  On some spots, I could barely take 1.5 pounds before tears formed.  He had absolutely no doubt that I had fibro, and, in fact, a pretty bad case of it.

This new research makes it clear that it's not necessary to have 11/18 points for a diagnosis.  The diagnosis can be made just as accurately with 3/18, and nearly as accurately with only one.

Be aware, also, that fibro-like symptoms can result from sleep deprivation.  At the worst of my sleeplessness, I had pain all over, all the time.  I found out that you can test a Sleep Number bed for 30 nights and return it owing only the delivery fee.  After one week, the pain was greatly reduced. 

The tender points now hurt only when someone actually presses on them.  While this did not take away my fibro diagnosis, it did make day-to-day life more bearable.

What does it mean?

What does it mean?

What does it mean when anti-depressants make a CFS patient sicker but have no positive effect? Clearly, it means that CFS is not the same thing as depression.

What does it mean when the only medications that have shown uniformly positive results in research are anti-viral medications? Clearly, it means that CFS is not the same thing as depression.

What does it mean when a patient who asked for sleeping pills and pain pills and was given only anti-depressants gets worse on anti-depressants, but improves noticeably when finally given sleeping pills and pain pills? Clearly, it means that the patient has CFS, not depression.

It also means that doctors who were entrusted with treating the patient either didn't know or didn't care that their diagnosis and treatment were wrong. Research proved anti-depressants useless for CFS years ago. My doctors apparently had never read that research and were resistant to me telling them what I knew.

Instead of learning from the numerous CFS patients who report that anti-depressants don't help, a lot of doctors blame them for being difficult patients, instead of admitting the real problem is the doctors giving the wrong prescriptions.

CFS has some symptoms in common with depression. It has some symptoms in common with hypothyroid. It has some symptoms in common with AIDS. It has some symptoms in common with MS. But that does not mean that it is the same disease as any of those, because it also has symptoms that are not compatible with those diseases.  Symptoms that one of my doctors said "don't make sense", because he couldn't fit them into the rubric of depression, and didn't recognize as being those additional symptoms that prove it's CFS instead. He simply assumed that I was confused and giving him bad information, instead of changing his diagnosis to fit the symptoms.

Had I received sleeping pills and pain pills when I first asked for them, instead of being wrongly prescribed anti-depressants, the odds are that I would have returned to work in a few months. Instead, 7 years later, I'm still not able to work full-time, and have been told I will never be able to work full-time.

Doctors will never admit it, but they don't always know everything. Sometimes they make mistakes. Sometimes they make tragic mistakes.

If you're not improving despite following doctor's orders, it means the problem is with the doctor, not with you. 
Don't let any doctor call you a "non-compliant patient" because he assumes you're not improving because you're not taking the pills. If the doctor blames you for not getting better, either stand up to the doctor and tell him he's the problem, or just go find another doctor who takes a different approach.

I didn't improve at all until I got away from the doctors with the fixation on anti-depressants, to someone who was open-minded enough to consider that if anti-depressants were making me sicker, then maybe he should try something that wasn't an anti-depressant. The sleeping pills helped, which the anti-depressants didn't.

CFS is a difficult illness for both doctor and patient. Doctors like to see miracle cures and feel ineffective if the patient doesn't recover quickly. I've been told that it takes at least as long to recuperate as it did to deteriorate. If you have not slept well for ten years, it will take ten years to erase the sleep deficit. So, every month that you're taking a prescription that doesn't help adds another month to your recovery.  The doctor who expects that after half a dozen unhelpful prescriptions you'll suddenly bounce back to perfect health after one week on something that helps is being overoptimistic.

I'm improving slowly, now that I have the right pills, but any doctor who expects me to leap out of bed, go on a 10-mile hike this afternoon, and head back to work first thing Monday morning is clearly uninformed.

CFS is not a mental illness where a few days of pills can re-adjust abnormal chemistry and switch someone from extremely impaired to essentially normal. CFS is a physical illness where the body needs time to heal. Years of sleepless nights had left me with essentially no immune system. It took months of being on sleeping pills before my immune system kicked in again, and then it took 6 months of a 101 fever before the CFS virus was under control again.  There are objective tests that, if they had been done, would have proven that in January of that year my immune system was far less functional than it was by December.

I didn't need a blood test to tell me that: one winter, I was horizontal all winter with sinus problems, and the next winter had hardly any difficulty with my sinuses at all. The following winter, without the experimental sleeping pills, I was not sleeping well, but was taking CFS/Fibro Formula (www.DrRodger.com) which kept my immune system functioning.

Saturday, February 17, 2007

Summary of a Lecture by Dr. Paul Cheney, MD, PhD May 7, 1998
The National CFIDS Foundation
103 Aletha Rd, Needham Ma 02492
(781) 449-3535 Fax (781) 449-8606
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF CFIDS


CFIDS is a subset of a larger group of diseases, post viral syndrome or post infectious disease. Similar disease syndromes from the past are the following:
Great Britain in the '50s - a virus like polio which was later called ME, myalgic encephalitis. This was linked to an enterovirus, a polio-like virus.

You can read the rest at http://www.ncf-net.org/conference/CheneyLecture.htm

Activity limits
- types of exercise
Aerobic is BAD.
It actually kills mitochondria causing permanent damage
Anaerobic is GOOD.
You can lift weights, stretch, isometrics, anything you can do in 10 sec.

This has been known for decades among CFS specialists, yet just a few years ago, rheumatologists were telling me to exercise my way back to health by walking. Dr. Cheney says walking is bad for CFS, and my own experience proved it.

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

:)

A fellow activist has notified me that I've been noticed.

The National CFIDS Foundation Forum, Media Watch section, has noted -- and quoted -- two published letters that I wrote.

It's not where I expected to be lauded when I started my career of political activism decades ago.  And although it's not the path to the White House, I'll take it.  Life is what happens when you're making other plans, and I had to adapt when this damned disease made it clear that I was not going to be the first female president.  What I will be is a "name" in the arena that fate forced on me.

Saturday, February 10, 2007

Damned if you do, damned if you don't, Part 2

Once again, I have found a medication that helps my symptoms, but does so in a way that makes it impossible for me to seek outside employment.

My new pain pills are a godsend.  Except that even backing them up to an hour or two before bedtime, they're still making me sleep till at least 9 AM.  Since it takes a while to get my muscles moving in the morning, and it takes me quite a while to commute anywhere on the bus, that means that I could not possibly take a job that starts before 11 AM -- noon if I need to go somewhere other than downtown. 

Most office jobs here start at 8 or 8:30, so if I'm not awake till 9, I couldn't even take a job across the street and get there on time.

I went through this with the experimental sleeping pills, too.  Even if I took them at 5 PM, the disabling side effects lasted till noon.  They put me to sleep within 15-20 minutes, so I couldn't have taken them earlier.  BTDT with the first sleep aid I was given in 1988 -- I backed them up so far that I was taking them at work, which resulted in Vickey having to make sure I got off the bus at the right stop, and pointing me in the direction of home (fortunately, I only had to walk in a straight line to get there).  Same thing with those, I was non-functional till noon even taking them at 4:45 PM.

Unfortunately, the Disability judge seems unable to process the notion that my doctor preaches with every RX: "all medication has side effects".  He can't conceive of a medication that makes you worse.  Just pop a pill and get back to work; don't make excuses that it's causing new problems.

But this is actually fairly common for CFS patients.  CFS affects your metabolism, so medications that rely on being metabolized at a certain speed don't work properly.  That results in unusual side effects.  As a result, many CFS patients are unable to take any prescription medication, which leads to the erroneous conclusion that there can't be much wrong with them since they're not taking a boatload of prescriptions -- when I went for my first SSDI exam, some people had a grocery bag full of prescription bottles.  I had one prescription (not even for CFS) and a bottle of vitamins; anything else caused me problems or simply didn't work at all.

This is yet another way that the experts are able to sort out true CFS from some of the lookalikes: weird reactions to medications are common in CFS but rare in the others.  But to the average doctor (or judge) who is not familiar with CFS, the notion that you cannot take medication sounds too bizarre to be true.

Friday, February 9, 2007

7 Years

Some people believe that your life changes every 7 years.  Certainly when I got up this date 7 years ago, I did not expect to be disabled and unemployable for the next 7 years.  But by 3 PM on February 9, 2000 I was jobless, and my health has never returned to a point where I could manage full-time employment.  I've been told it never will.

Have things changed in the past 7 years? 

There were a lot of days in 2000 that I woke up and immediately threw up.  That's changed, thanks to finding a doctor who didn't go for the easy answer of forbidding me to eat things I don't eat anyway; he listened and realized that the problem was that I didn't eat for 12 hours between dinner and breakfast and my stomach acid had nothing to work on.  We added two antacids to my bedtime routine, problem solved.

There were days in 2000 when I was puking my guts out non-stop thanks to medication that research has shown to be useless for CFS.  I've finally gotten away from doctors who think CFS is another name for depression and found someone who understands that you can't fix viruses with psych drugs.  You fix viruses by building up the immune system so that the body can vanquish them naturally.

There have been days in the past 7 years that I could not even sit up.  Now I can fairly consistently sit upright for about an hour before either the back spasms or the lightheadedness forces me back horizontal.  Some days I can even manage several hours at a time.

There was a long period when I was only able to work 5 minutes out of every hour.  Now I can fairly consistently work for 2 hours at a time.

For years, I slept only 2 hours a night due to pain (what I believe precipitated the relapse).  I progressed to sleeping 2 hours at a time before the pain woke me up.  Now, thanks to finally (last week) getting prescription pain pills, I'm fairly consistently sleeping 6-8 hours a night.  Not necessarily 8 hours consecutively, but most of it is now at night, instead of 2 hours between 5-7 AM, 2 hours between 9-11 AM, 2 hours between 1-3 PM....

For most of the last 7 winters, I've been down much of the winter with chronic sinus problems, a vicious spiral of infections sapping my already-tapped-out immune system and my immune system being unable to control the next infection.  If I'd had a job, I would've lost it for excessive absenteeism -- my business partner once counted that in one month, I had e-mailed her on 17 days that I was not even able to sit up because of my sinuses, much less accomplish any work.  This winter (knock wood), I've only lost a couple days to sinuses, and weather-related rather than infection.  To me, that says that my immune system is getting stronger.

I see small, but important, changes over the past 7 years.  But if my friends are correct that "your life changes completely every 7 years", I'll wake up tomorrow with all my health problems under control, ready to go back to work full-time.  Based on how I feel right now, I don't think that's going to happen.  But I'm more than ready for my 7-year change.

You could say, I have the 7-year itch.

Wednesday, February 7, 2007

Doctors/treatment get poor grades from patients

In a survey of over 1300 CFS/fibro patients, eFibro reports 22% rated the current treatment they are receiving as poor, 38% as merely fair, 30% as good, and only 10% as excellent.

You can read that as 60% of patients being basically dissatisfied with their treatment, which probably means that 60% of patients feel they’re not getting noticeably better, which is a pretty sorry statistic for Modern Medical Science, which likes to pride itself on being able to cure the most dreadful diseases.

Part of the problem is that the treatment of CFS requires thinking outside the box, which is not something that’s taught in medical school.

I spent several years getting worse at the hands of MDs – I couldn’t have even rated their treatment "poor", because treatment was basically non-existent (in the first 3 years of this relapse, I took medication for less than 60 days: I repeatedly had to stop a prescription within a few days because it made me sicker, and then was required to wait weeks or months till my next appointment to get the prescription changed because the doctor's office would not take a message). And then they wondered why I wasn’t getting better when I had no medication?!

It shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone, and especially not to doctors, that an untreated condition does not improve. Or that it gets even worse.

I finally gave up on that medical group (which advertised "innovative treatment", but didn't actually provide it) and went to a DO – osteopaths are a little better at creative thinking because of a slightly different school curriculum – and while he at least was open-minded enough to listen to me, he still didn’t have any answers that I didn’t already have myself. He was willing to experiment with prescriptions, but at that point, I’d deteriorated so far that this was like trying to dig my way out of a 50-foot hole with a teaspoon, so I’d have to rate the treatment as only fair because it wasn’t helping much; it certainly wasn’t getting me back to work. I needed drastic measures, and he didn’t have anything that could produce such spectacular results.

Then our local support group invited a guest speaker, a chiropractor who had become somewhat of an expert on CFS. Chiropractors get a very different curriculum than MDs and DOs, and this one hadextra training in nutrition to boot. He had an all-natural regimen that cost about the same as one prescription, and without the side effects. The 5 minutes I spent talking to him after the lecture is the only portion of my medical care in the past 7 years that I would rate as excellent, because it’s the part that did me the most good in the long run. He’s the only doctor among the dozen I’ve seen since 2000 who actually knew enough about CFS to do me some good. (For more information, a personal consultation, or to purchase the books and supplements, visit www.DrRodger.com ) Most of them knew nothing, but were convinced that they knew more than I did and therefore refused to listen to me. (In each case, when I finally found someone willing to prescribe what I had asked for initially, I improved, while the things they prescribed instead of what I asked for made me sicker.)

Nonetheless, we’re approaching a quarter century since the Incline and Lyndonville epidemics started and 20 years since CDC applied the name CFS to the disease, and there’s still no workable treatment available to patients (there are some anti-viral treatments which are, unfortunately, only available through clinical trials in a very limited number of locations). 100% of patients should rate THAT as poor.

The most important question you can ask a doctor

Knowing the right question to ask your doctor

    Fact: A doctor in this country interrupts a patient, on average, in the
first 18 seconds of a visit.

A prominent surgeon waited about a minute and a half before issuing his
diagnosis to Jerome Groopman on his damaged hand. "He was dead wrong," says
Groopman, who got four diagnoses from six surgeons. "And these are big
names."

    Fact: More than 15 percent - some say more than 20 percent - of medical
diagnoses are wrong. At least half result in serious injury or death.


Groopman tells of a woman who saw close to 30 doctors for a constellation of
ailments that gradually sapped the life out of her. She endured excruciating
pain and was down to 85 pounds. Her immune system was failing and she had
developed severe osteoporosis. All of them missed what was ailing her.
Finally, a fresh doctor asked a fresh set of questions. He listened to her
and found that she suffered from a gluten allergy that prevented her from
receiving the nutrients in the food she ate. After years of agony, she
quickly recovered.

    Fact: More than a quarter of all radiological tests, including CAT scans
and MRIs, are misread. "Misdiagnoses are not rare at all,"
says Groopman,
the noted oncologist and chief of experimental medicine at the Beth Israel
Deaconess Medical Center, who assembled this data.

While the patient safety movement has led to major improvements in protocols
to avoid systems errors, he points out, nothing has been done to address a
more profound issue: how doctors think. And bad thinking is what causes
countless mistakes
. "No one talks about this stuff," Groopman says.
He is struck by the lack of independent thinking among the residents he
leads on hospital rounds. "These are really smart people, and when asked for
a diagnosis they download cookbook recipes on their computers," he explains.
"If it's not that, they look blankly. How do I teach them how to think? I
realized I didn't know how I think. No one ever taught me how to think."

Groopman addresses this touchy subject in a book, "How Doctors Think," due
out this spring. In it are examples of bad thinking, including plenty of his
own, that produced harrowing results. None of this is news to patients. Most
of us know someone who has endured a misdiagnosis or have done so ourselves.
My friend Barbara went through a year of agony because of one.

Groopman's first child developed a persistent low-grade fever and stomach
pain at nine months. A doctor said not to worry, it's just a virus. The
child's condition deteriorated, but the doctor remained unmoved. Eventually,
Groopman and his wife rushed their son to an emergency room, where they
learned the child had an intestinal obstruction that would have killed him
had it gone untreated.

    What went wrong here?

The doctor sized up Groopman and his wife as neurotic first-time parents and
built his diagnosis around that premise. At work, says Groopman, were two
suspects common in these nightmares.

The first is what he calls anchoring - where a doctor interrupts you, seizes
on a symptom or complaint, and declares, "It's this." This snap judgment
anchors all ensuing thinking.


The second he calls attribution, to which women are particularly vulnerable,
where assumptions about a patient are attributed to bad data.


Groopman tells of a woman with a newborn child and two young children who
complained about constant nausea and diarrhea. "The doctor looked at her and
decided it was stress, that she was neurotic," Groopman said. "So he
attributes all of her complaints to the stereotype he has in his mind. I saw
her a few months ago. She had been diagnosed with a tumor in her intestine
but had been taking Zoloft for a year and a half."

Time is an insidious agent in all this. "In today's medical environment, the
clinic is a factory," he says. "It's a world of eight-minute visits. The
mistakes are made in the moment. Doctors draw immediate diagnoses rather
than listen and pursue leads. And when complaints persist, they all too
often cling to their first thought and even discount contradictory evidence.

"It's impossible to figure out a difficult problem in eight minutes," he
said. "A doctor has one eye on the clock and one eye on a computer screen as
he types notes. The truth is, you can't think well in haste.

"There is no generic besttreatment to a serious problem," he says: "We
delude ourselves to think the answer is the systems solution - 'We'll give
you an algorithm: if it's A then B then C.' You're got to know what A is in
the first place. And sometimes you have to go past C."

Many in the medical community will bristle at Groopman's findings. Others
will recognize the truth in what he says and, with luck, a few of the bean
counters controlling medicine today as well. They can't dismiss the book. It
is meticulously researched and written by a physician of stature.

"One solution for misdiagnosis is a patient or family member who knows how
doctors think," Groopman said.

So what should we be asking our doctors, over and over?

-->"What else could it be?"

         Sam Allis writes for the Boston Globe: allisglobe.com

This is a problem all too commonly reported among CFS patients.  Doctors see that you are female, and leap to the conclusion that you are depressed, neurotic, or menopausal.

In the early days of the epidemic, one of the virologists researching AIDS was asked to evaluate some CFS patients for viral involvement.  Every one of the seriously-ill women was returned to the referring doctor with a psych diagnosis.  Finally, a male patient who was not nearly as impaired was sent over.  The same symptoms, lesser intensity, produced a conclusion that there was some virus at work, but it was not one that they could test for.

I have had doctors cling for dear life to their diagnosis of depression even after receiving psych evals that say there is no sign of depression.  They could not accept that they were wrong, so they had to either ignore the psych eval entirely, or arrogantly claim that the psych expert was wrong, and that their one semester of Psych 101 makes them better-qualified to make a psych diagnosis than the guy with Ph.D. or Psy.D. after his name.  A doctor who never once addressed my emotions was positive I was depressed, even though the depression diagnosis absolutely requires an emotional component.  The symptoms I had were those that anyone with the flu would have, but he wouldn't accept that rationale from the person with better psych credentials.  After telling me that he would not look further for a physical reason until I had a psych eval, he still didn't want to look further for a physical reason after being told that it was definitely not depression.  As Dr. Groopman notes in his book, once the doctor had made the diagnosis, nothing, not even contradictory expert input, was going to change his mind.

When my symptoms were contradictory to depression, and I complained that anti-depressants were making me sicker, the doctor could not, would not, reconsider "what else could it be?"  He simply turned around in his head what I said to him until he could make it fit the diagnosis he wanted to make.  The medical records reflect what he wanted me to say, and not what I actually did report.  He had himself convinced that I refused to take anti-depressants because I didn't want to get well and "have to" go back to work; nowhere in the records does it say that I took them a couple days and each time, within half an hour, became violently ill --  I could not continue taking them due to the severity of the side effects.

More than 15 years ago, Dr. David Bell cited statistics that fully half of all patients who initially got a "psychosomatic" diagnosis were eventually diagnosed with a real physical problem.  In some cases, the patient is extremely sensitive -- I've known people who could tell when some test value fluctuated by as little as 1% -- they would know that something was going wrong before a blood test could pick it up; a few weeks or months later, the fluctuation would have increased enough to become an abnormal test result. 

In other cases, the doctor leapt to a diagnosis of "psychosomatic" without getting all the facts.   As Dr. Groopman notes, this happens often to women, who are tagged "neurotic" because male doctors have a stereotype about women, that they exaggerate everything in order to get attention.  We women joke about it that a man with the sniffles takes to his bed and acts like he's going to die; a woman with the sniffles just keeps going.  Male doctors see it the other way around.  As a friend points out quite regularly, people assume that everyone does what they do: someone who eats a steady diet of fast food from the burger place next to the hospital is going to assume that the patients find it equally convenient to eat greasy garbage, and will pooh-pooh the patient's own reports that she eats mostly fresh produce from the farmer's market which is much closer to her work place.

And, unfortunately, autoimmune diseases tend to strike women more frequently than men.  They may not show up on the standard blood tests, resulting in assumptions that the patient is just looking for sympathy or attention or permission to quit her job.  In 20 years of dealing with CFS symptoms, I've found that female doctors are more likely to accept my reports of impairments as true and entirely accurate, and male doctors are more likely to attribute it to some cause other than a virus or accuse me of exaggerating frequency and intensity because I don't want to work, or I've figured out a way to get my husband to take care of me, or that I'd rather scrape by on a few hundred dollars a month Disability benefit than earn $50,000+ a year and be able to buy anything my heart desires (because no one who has not been on Disability would ever guess that benefits leave you below the poverty level). 

 

Neurobiological Differences Found in CFS

A study of neurochemicals in the brain and cerebrospinal fluid is shedding light on neurometabolic activity in CFS and how it differs from neuropsychiatric disorders that have symptoms that overlap CFS.
See http://www.cfids.org/cfidslink/2007/neurobiological.asp

Just because illnesses have similar symptoms doesn't mean that they are the same illness. CFS shares symptoms with MS, AIDS, cancer, thyroid, polio... but isn't any of them.
The latest information on what CFS is (not the assumptions that it "might be" psychosomatic, but the truth) is at See http://www.cfids.org/cfidslink/2007/iacfs.asp, the report on the latest IACFS conference.
There was "a convergence of findings" around brain function and traits, mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress, molecular biomarkers, virology and epidemiology.
For example, brain imaging and cognitive testing, exercise testing, genomic analysis, spinal fluid protein and cardio monitoring have all uncovered indications of oxidative stress and/or mitochondrial dysfunction in CFS. The mitochondria are involved in energy conversion at the cellular level.

However, as Dr. Starlanyl has stressed, "all tests are normal may mean the proper tests have not been done". Doing the correct tests may show something very different.
Nearly a quarter-century after the Tahoe epidemic, there are still doctors who don't know the first thing about CFS and are convinced that it's fakery because the basic blood tests are normal. Most of them refuse to be educated.
If you run into a doctor who refuses to accept that your problem is not psychological and comes up with the most far-fetched explanation for what you're really depressed/anxious over, change doctors!
I made the mistake of believing that because it was a well-respected medical group, they knew what they were doing. All they really knew how to do was to string me along until it was too late. Too late to recuperate and too late to sue.
If you get proper treatment in the early stages, your chances of remission are good. The longer it takes to get help, the worse your odds. After 5 years, the odds are almost nil, and, unfortunately, it took 5 years for me to get to someone who knew what he was doing.
Not every doctor knows everything about every disease. Do yourself a favor and find someone who DOES know about CFS. They'll deride this as "doctor shopping", but regaining your health is more important than paying attention to verbal abuse.

Tuesday, February 6, 2007

Damned if you do, damned if you don't

Doctors who don't know what they're seeing find all sorts of ways to blame the patient for her symptoms.

When I was married, the doctor's conclusion was that all my symptoms could be attributed to "you resent your husband making you work".  (Do I look that dumb that I would consent to marrying someone who told me I needed to support him till he graduated, if I were looking for a husband who would let me quit work?!)  Didn't matter to him that I said the symptoms started before we got married, they got worse after we got married, and that was proof enough for him.

Now that I'm divorced, I was told that all my symptoms were a result of being depressed over the divorce.  The symptoms were there while I was married, but this doctor chose to ignore that inconvenient fact.

A friend who has never been married (by choice) was told that her symptoms were because she was unhappy that she was unmarried.

Married, single or divorced, they're sure your CFS is solely caused by your marital status.

If you have a job, they blame the symptoms on stress.  If you don't have a job, they decree that you are faking these symptoms so you don't have to go back to work.  If you lost your job because of worsening symptoms, they turn this around in their heads and conclude that your symptoms started when you got depressed about losing your job for reasons unrelated to your health.

If you exercise regularly, you're just fatigued from over-exercising.  If you don't, then the problem is deconditioning.  If you stopped exercising because it made your symptoms worse, they conclude that you got worse because you stopped exercising.  A doctor who doesn't know much about CFS knows only that exercise produces a feel-good effect in most people and tells you to exercise and improve your mood.  A doctor who does know about CFS knows that you're telling the truth, that you had no choice, you had to stop exercising because it was unduly exhausting. 

I used to walk 20-25 miles a day on weekends.  Suddenly, I could barely make it the 10 feet to the bathroom, and needed to rest on the floor for half an hour before I could make it the 10 feet back to the bed.  There is no question that having that little stamina is abnormal, and especially for someone with my athletic history.  The doctor concluded that this was just one more bit of creative embellishment to get my way. It was too bizarre to be true.

"Too bizarre", except in the minds of CFS experts, who've heard not only that, but also reports of being unable to comprehend written or spoken English, and seen for themselves patients struggling to find the right word when speaking. 

The layman who looked after me during the initial virus naively called it "brain fever", and, in the long run, it appears his assessment was more accurate than some of the doctors'.  Research has shown viral damage and lesions in the brain, and all the symptoms can be attributed to a dysfunction of the central nervous system.

Which has nothing to do with whether you're married, single or divorced, or whether you work or not.

It's not the patients who need psychological help to overcome the symptoms, it's the doctors who put the blame on patients rather than listening to ALL the facts.  It was obvious from the comments of several of my doctors that the real problem was that they have a very low opinion of women, and had not yet moved their thinking into the 20th Century, not even when the rest of us were already into the 21st. 

All that mattered to them was their opinion that "all women want to be housewives" and not the facts being presented that this woman had started her own business as a high school student, this woman had worked for years, this woman was a successful careerwoman -- not even the fact that the problems started with a severe virus and were still accompanied by flu-like symptoms.


Saturday, February 3, 2007

No simple solution for complex disease

People who don’t understand the causes behind CFS come up with simplistic solutions that don’t take into account the facts.

For example, I had a horrible case of insomnia for years. It was suggested that I could cure the insomnia simply by avoiding daytime naps and having set times for bedtime and rising. But the problem started when I was working full-time and didn’t have the opportunity to take daytime naps. Going to bed at the same time that I had for decades years was easy – falling asleep after I went to bed was the hard part. I’d toss and turn for hours, trying to find a position that didn’t hurt, finally falling asleep of sheer exhaustion between 5 and 6 AM. Because I was still working when the insomnia started, my alarm clock went off at the same time it had for years, so I had a set time for waking, too. But that rigorous schedule didn’t "cure" the problem; that schedule hadn’t changed in years before the insomnia started, so that wasn’t the cause of the insomnia.

Simply put, the daytime naps were not the CAUSE of the insomnia; they were the EFFECT. On 1-2 hours sleep a night, I was (as would be expected) basically non-functional. Once I’d lost my job and could take a nap if I felt sleepy, those naps were what kept me minimally functional. Taking a detailed medical history would have shown that the insomnia started a couple months before the napping started. However, that would’ve required taking more time to find a solution instead of handing me a pat answer and putting the blame on the patient.

Once I was finally put on sleeping pills that put me to sleep 8 hours every night, the daytime napping stopped almost immediately. Proving it wasn’t "depressed escapism", or "laziness", or any of the other theories proposed by people who had selective deafness where the timeline was concerned. Just as I said all along, the napping was an uncontrolable response to the constant state of exhaustion caused by sleeping only 2 hours a night, and when the sleep problem was addressed, the naps were no longer necessary to keep me functioning.

With the sleep debt out of the way, we could look at the real reason for the insomnia: unrelenting pain that kept me awake. Like the Princess and the Pea, I could not get comfortable in any position. At my worst, even a wrinkle in the bedsheet could feel like a log in the bed. But that was the fibromyalgia that developed after two years of sleepless nights. The original source of pain was arthritis/bursitis and blinding headaches that didn’t respond to medication.

Similarly, I was having daily digestive problems. I was handed a copy of the IBS diet (no acidic, spicy or greasy foods) and told to report back after I’d been on it for two weeks. I’d actually been on it for many years, so I didn’t have to come back in two weeks to know that it wasn’t going to solve the problem. The nurse asked what I ate. I’m not one of those people who has had a PB&J for lunch every day my whole life – I eat an extremely varied diet. The only thing I have every day is milk. Aha!, she said. Don’t confuse me with the fact that your digestive distress occurs BEFORE you drink the milk, my mind is already made up that you are lactose intolerant and should switch to soy milk. (Never mind that my digestive tract reacts badly to soy, and I’d be even sicker if I had soy milk, soy cheese, soy burgers, etc. She tuned me out when I said that. Soy is one of the top ten foods that people are allergic to, but that didn’t register with her. She simply assumed I was making excuses because I didn’t want to give up fast food burgers, which I rarely eat.) 

Years later, another doctor processed all the facts before making a pronouncement. If I could sometimes drink half a gallon of milk in a day with no problems, I was definitely not lactose intolerant. And if I hadn’t had pizza or tacos in over a year, it definitely wasn’t something that could be fixed by avoiding pizza and tacos. Instead of assuming that anyone who’s awake at 3 AM is stuffing her face at 3 AM, this doctor asked about my eating habits, and concluded that the real problem was that I usually didn’t eat anything between dinner and breakfast ... too much stomach acid with nothing to work on for 12+ hours. A $3 bottle of antacid pills solved the problem – take 2 at bedtime. Again, the improvement was almost immediate, because the solution wasn’t the first thing that leapt to mind, but a solution that was tailored to the actual problem based on the facts I gave, not what the doctor imagined based on statistics that most people’s digestive problems are caused by a steady diet of fast food and that most people’s weight problems are caused by overeating, not defective metabolism.

Another quick-fix assumption is that I’m allergic to my cats (except that I didn’t have cats and lived in a no-pet building when I first got sick, so there was no residual pet hair in the apartment from a prior tenant) or that I’m allergic to something in my house or office. Since the diagnosis, I’ve lived in three cities, half a dozen residences, worked in numerous buildings (including two brand new ones), and been sick in every one of them. Either every apartment and office in California is contaminated, or the problem is not something that can be avoided by moving and getting different furnishings.

This house has hardwood floors in every room but the bedroom. For several weeks, I slept in the living room, wore only clothes that had just been washed and left in the hamper in the hallway, and still felt bad, so the problem isn’t something in the carpeting.

I don’t feel any better when I stay at my parents’ house, which hasn’t had a cat in it for over 20 years, nor do I feel worse when I cuddle adoptable kittens at PetsMart. So the problem isn’t cats.

The problems, unquestionably, started with a virus that was both long and strong – I ran a 105 fever for several days; definitely not the 24-hour flu. The day before, even the hour before, I felt fine. I have never felt normal since. That virus had nothing to do with allergies or psychology. It wasn’t caused by getting a divorce or losing a job. I was simply in the wrong place at the wrong time and crossed paths with the wrong person who passed me the virus.

The diagnostic hallmark of CFS is the patient’s reaction to exercise. With depression, if you exercise, you come back energized. With CFS, you come back and collapse into bed. It’s been proven in enough studies and by enough patients’ personal experiences. Yet, practicing what Dr. David Bell calls Game Show Medicine, almost every doctor has recommended to me that I exercise my way back to health, and if I felt worse afterward, then I’d just have to push myself harder till I built up my stamina to do a full workout. The real story is that I had walked 4+ miles a day for years, to and from work. One day, I got about halfway to work and had to sit and wait for the next bus because I couldn’t make it any further. A coupleweeks later, the four blocks from the bus stop to my desk left me totally exhausted. The timeline proves that this was not deconditioning, because you don’t decondition that far, that fast, not even if you’re spending 24/7 in bed (which I clearly wasn’t, because I was spending 9 hours a day at the office where we didn’t have a bed, and another hour commuting, which required walking to/from the bus stop). The doctors who listened carefully instead of instantly jumping to conclusions could tell that the problem wasn’t caused by lack of exercise or deconditioning.

One of my doctors complained "nothing you say makes sense." And that’s true – if you’re looking for the symptoms of depression, what I describe doesn’t make sense; a lot of what I reported is directly contradictory to what would be expected with depression because (DUH!) I don’t have depression. What I was reporting was exactly, spot-on, what happens with CFS. I could’ve been reading it from a textbook. But if the doctor’s never read the textbook on CFS, he can’t put the pieces together and will continue to dismiss the patient as "not making sense". It’s the simplest way to reconcile conflicting symptoms: put the blame on the patient’s reporting.

Meanwhile, a doctor who does know what to look for will listen to those key words "I started, but couldn’t finish", "I tried, but failed", and knows that depressives don’t start and don’t try, they assume before starting that they will fail so there’s no point in trying. Running out of energy mid-task is a sure sign of CFS – once a depressive is persuaded to start something, they are pleasantly surprised that they can do it and will usually finish once they get into the swing of things. A CFS patient, to the contrary, goes into things believing that they are capable of doing it, and then finds that their body/brain simply won’t cooperate.

Similarly, CFS patients will over-estimate their performance on tests, because they are basing their estimate on what they know they used to be able to do; when I had my first SSDI Mental Status Exam, I walked out convinced that I had done too well and wouldn’t be deemed impaired enough to get benefits. I was simply horrified a few weeks later when the results came back that on memory tasks I had done "worse than a traumatic brain injury patient" and on certain of the cognitive tasks that I completed, I took several times longer than a normal person to puzzle them out. I was somewhat reassured when I learned later that the results I had on the test were precisely the results predicted by Dr. Bastien’s neuropsychological "signature" for CFS, including short-term auditory memory "worse than traumatic brain injury".

With the advent of CDC’s long-overdue recognition of CFS as a serious PHYSICAL disease, they hope to have CFS taught in the medical schools. But if the professors are unfamiliar with what it really is, how can they teach it? I fear they will tell the students it’s been proven to be a physical disease, and then continue teach them the same wrong-headed solutions that were offered to me: exercise and anti-depressants, because they’re unaware of the research proving that neither will work on CFS, and that exercise can be downright dangerous for a CFS patient. (Dr. Cheney, probably the person who knows the most about CFS, outright forbids CFS patients to do any sort of aerobic exercise, though they can, and should, stretch and flex to maintain muscle tone.)

Although the problem isn’t entirely caused by sleep disturbance, my first specialist taught me that it’s important to address the sleep problem first. Some things will resolve themselves if you’re sleeping better (e.g., my burnt-out immune system became functional again and began fighting the virus after I’d been on the sleeping pills for a few months; and with adequate restorative sleep my pain level went from an intolerable 10-of-10 to an average of 4, which is still not pleasant but isn’t bad enough to pray for death [Jeanne Hess, R.N., describes level 4 as "pain has your full attention now"]; and my digestive problems were no longer a several-times-daily occurrence). Treating the sleep disturbance first will leave you with a much smaller number of things that need to be addressed pharmaceutically.

Unfortunately, for years, my begging for a sleeping pill (or a pain pill so that I could get comfortable enough to fall asleep) fell on deaf ears and I got continually worse as the sleep debt built up and my immune system degenerated. I finally got to a specialist who knew more about CFS than the doctors I’d been dealing with, one who recognized immediately that the problem was nota patient who stubbornly refused to return to work, but doctors who stubbornly refused to accept that the patient had previously been instructed by a CFS specialist in recommended treatments for her condition, and thus really did know better than a generalist what should be prescribed.

After reviewing the medical records and actually listening to my comments about my repeated attempts to work, he was sure that it wasn’t a situation that the patient didn’t want to work, but that the patient wasn’t getting what she needed to make her ABLE to work.

He could see for himself that the only treatment I had refused to try was a prescription I had repeatedly been told not take due to a bad reaction to a related drug; he could also see that the prescriptions that should have been given weren’t in the records anywhere. No question in his mind that the inability to return to work had nothing to do with the patient, and everything to do with uninformed doctors’ simplistic solutions that had nothing to do with the actual problem being described, some of which were absolutely inappropriate and dangerous for a CFS patient and might have resulted in death.

The simple solutions may seem intuitive to the friends and doctors who recommend them, but CFS is a disease best left to the experts, who know how to listen for the difference between CFS and depression, CFS and allergies, CFS and generalized laziness..., and who know that anti-depressants and exercise and "change of environment" have no beneficial effect on a virus, and are therefore not to be prescribed to the CFS patient. The two medications that have shown to offer real improvement are both anti-virals. Not anti-depressants or pep pills, but something that addresses the root of the problem: the virus that started it all in the first place.

I was recently given pain pills for the first time in 7 years of asking for them, even begging for them, and the first morning already woke up feeling like I’d slept, which hasn’t happened often in the past 7 years. Thanks to the doctors’ ridiculous belief that giving me pain pills would turn me into an addict, I’ve lost (to date) 7 years of living my life to the fullest, 7 years of my career, 7 years of contributions to my retirement fund, and put up with 7 years of verbal abuse from people who think that all they have to do to fix my problems is tell me to get off my butt and go back to work, because they haven’t seen what happens when I do go to work.

Unfortunately, because I dealt with "specialists" who really didn’t know the first thing about treating CFS, all I have to show for the past 7 years is a pile of letters from lawyers who’ve reviewed my case saying "you got a raw deal from both the doctors and the judges". But sympathy doesn’t pay the bills for the rest of my life; I still need cash for that. So I still have to deal with a judge who ignores any evidence that he doesn’t like, including blood tests that are "off the charts" and VocRehab experts who tell him I’m unemployable, because his simplistic solution to CFS is based on the assumption that if he denies my disability benefits, I’ll be miraculously cured and inspired to return to work.

But he, like many other people, ignores the fact that I’ve been working. I did some pick-up work while I was getting Unemployment, and started my own business the day my Unemployment ran out (because you can’t start a business and collect Unemployment simultaneously, and I was playing by the rules – qualifying for Unemployment by applying for work that I thought I could do with some accommodations). The problem isn’t that I don’t want to work – the problem is that I cannot work enough hours to be self-supporting without landing back in bed after a few days.

Given my way, I would have been back to work as soon as possible after losing my job. But all the simplistic solutions in the world will not cure a virus. If I had had a prescription pad, I would’ve gotten the right pills right away, but because I had to rely on other people to get them, I couldn’t get well enough to return to work, and have been told I won’t ever work full-time again because of doctors’ incompetence. 

 

Friday, February 2, 2007

FINALLY!

Since 2000, I have been asking doctors for pain pills, because the pain wakes me up and keeps me awake.  Advil, when it works, only works long enough for me to get 2 hours of sleep, and then I have to lay awake in pain until the next dose kicks in.  Sometimes, the pain would be bad enough to wake me up even after taking a sleeping pill.  It was obvious to me that the pain needed to be dealt with in order for me to sleep well enough to recuperate and return to my career.  (The only time I slept through the pain was when I was on the sleeping pill strong enough to leave me "stoned" and non-functional the whole next day.  Obviously, taking that was not going to get me back to work, even in a menial task.)

Instead of experimenting to see if something for the pain would help me sleep, I got lectures to suck it up, and prejudicial comments about how "all women" are whiny babies who can't handle a little pain, and assumptions that if they gave me narcotic pain pills for the neurologic pain that would turn me into an addict.  (Statistically, less than 1% of chronic pain patients turn into addicts who abuse their pills.  The remaining 99+% use the pills exactly as prescribed; they are dependent on them the same way as diabetics are dependent on insulin, but whoever heard of that being referred to as an "insulin addict"?)

Finally, someone who has neurologic illness in his family agreed to a trial of Tramadol/Ultram, which is the mildest narcotic pain reliever there is.  It's so mild that it's available without a prescription in Canada.

The bottle says to take one every 4 hours.  I took one at bedtime, and slept 8 hours without the pain waking me up.  More than 12 hours later, the pain is just starting to break through my concentration.  I'm thinking about a hot bath for the pain, but haven't reached for a second pill.

If someone had listened to me 7 years ago that the insomnia was connected to pain and given me pain pills instead of anti-depressants (which made me sicker), I might have been back to work full-time in a matter of months.  Instead, I've suffered needlessly for a tenth of my three-score-and-ten. According to a pain management specialist, as little as 48 hours of unrelieved pain is enough to cause changes to the nerves, which may be permanent.  One theory about fibromyalgia is that it's rooted in such nervous system changes from unrelieved or inadequately relieved pain.

Doctors take an oath to "first do no harm".  Unfortunately, so many of them are concerned about doing harm to the 1% who might become addicted that they do serious and permanent harm to the 99% who are not going to become addicts. 

It's well known that there is such a thing as an Addictive Personality; someone who is an alcoholic is more likely to become addicted to other substances, whereas someone who is able to control their drinking is equally likely to use prescriptions responsibly.  But even though I reported that I have a glass of wine with dinner once a month at most, doctors leapt to the conclusion that they could not give me pain medication because I might become an addict.  Statistics don't bear them out.